Pope Leo XIV’s first encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas, is not a rejection of technology. It is a rejection of surrender.

The Pope is warning that artificial intelligence cannot be treated as morally neutral when it is designed by human beings, owned by powerful institutions, trained on human society, and deployed into unequal systems.

The encyclical calls for artificial intelligence to serve humanity rather than concentrate power. It focuses on human dignity, truth, labor, social justice, peace, and the need to safeguard the human person in the age of AI.

That framing matters because AI is no longer a distant technical debate. It is entering education, medicine, law, finance, war, government, and work. It is increasingly being presented not as a product, but as infrastructure.

Sam Altman has described a future in which intelligence becomes a utility, bought by the meter like electricity or water. That idea may sound efficient. It is also profoundly political.

If intelligence becomes a utility, who owns it?
Who prices it?
Who regulates it?
Who is excluded?
Who decides what it may be used for?

The Pope’s warning lands precisely where governments and tech companies are weakest: morality.

Anthropic has also published research identifying internal emotion-related concepts in AI models. The careful point is important: this does not mean AI “feels.” It means large models can develop internal representations that mirror emotion-related concepts in human language, and researchers are still working to understand how those structures influence model behavior.

That should make the public more engaged, not more passive.

The problem is not that AI is powerful. The problem is that power is being built faster than public accountability.

If AI enters war, killing becomes more distant.
If AI enters labor markets, displacement can be framed as efficiency.
If AI enters education, inequality can be automated.
If AI enters governance, human judgment can be replaced by systems most people cannot inspect.

The Pope is not saying technology should stop.

He is saying humanity cannot become a spectator to its own replacement.

The question is no longer whether AI can think.

The question is whether humans will still be allowed to decide what thinking is for.

Share this post

Written by

Olga Nesterova
Olga Nesterova is a journalist and founder of ONEST Network, a reader-supported platform covering U.S. and global affairs. A former White House correspondent and UN diplomat, she focuses on international security and geopolitical strategy.

Comments

Treasury Launches Trump Accounts App as Billionaire-Backed Investment Program Goes Live
Trump speaking at the White House, July 6, 2026

Treasury Launches Trump Accounts App as Billionaire-Backed Investment Program Goes Live

By Olga Nesterova 2 min read
Washington Pulls Back — Then Calls Allied Adaptation a ‘Distraction’
National flags of participating countries displayed during the opening ceremony of Sea Breeze 2026 in Portland, United Kingdom, on July 13, 2026. The US co-sponsored exercise focuses on interoperability among NATO maritime and ground forces operating in the Black Sea region. US Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Leon Vonguyen.

Washington Pulls Back — Then Calls Allied Adaptation a ‘Distraction’

By Olga Nesterova 8 min read
Middle East Brief: The Hormuz Standoff Returns the Region to War
A U.S. military aircraft prepares for operations connected to strikes on Iranian military targets, July 12, 2026. Credit: U.S. Central Command / Department of Defense.

Middle East Brief: The Hormuz Standoff Returns the Region to War

By Olga Nesterova 7 min read
NATO Day Two: Billions for Ukraine, an Alliance Rearming — and a New War Escalating Beside It
Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a press encounter with President Trump at the 2026 NATO Summit in Ankara

NATO Day Two: Billions for Ukraine, an Alliance Rearming — and a New War Escalating Beside It

By Olga Nesterova 5 min read